mer, Nov 1st 2023
The Swiss Fairness Commission describes advertising with climate neutrality as unfair. As long as there are no methods for measuring the promise, climate neutrality cannot be used for advertising purposes.
Slogans such as “CO2-neutral”, “climate-neutral” or “climate-positive” are therefore misleading despite the label, the consumer protection agency announced on Tuesday. If companies do not adapt their advertising, the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (Seco) will have to take action against them, the foundation concludes, based on a verdict of the Fairness Commission (SLK).
In two decisions on the cases of a heating oil company and a baby food producer, the SLK states that advertising with climate neutrality is unfair. As long as there are no definitive, generally accepted methods for measuring sustainability or ensuring implementation, such so-called green marketing messages would mislead consumers.
According to the SLK’s recommendation, heating oil companies should no longer claim that their heating oil is climate-neutral before providing complete proof. This would have to include a calculation of the production-side climate impact and complete proof of its compensation – using a generally accepted method.
The manufacturer of baby food advertised with the slogan “our jars are climate positive”. The company claimed that its environmental protection projects overcompensated for its own CO2 emissions. In the absence of concrete information and evidence, the SLK also recommends that this company refrain from making this claim.
At the same time as the complaints to the SLK, Consumer Protection had also filed complaints against unfair climate advertising with Seco. These are pending.
The foundation describes the lack of legal requirements for environment-related advertising as a basic problem. As long as the requirements are unclear, advertising with “green” statements must be considered unfair. The advertising messages have no verifiable truth content.
French 
English 
German 
Spanish 
Arabic