No information about spy software from the Federal Police
Published: Thursday, Jan 18th 2024, 08:40
Back to Live Feed
A lawyer is not granted access to the contract for Israeli spy software used by the federal police and intelligence service. This was decided by the Federal Administrative Court. The lawyer suspects that the spyware in question is Pegasus.
The developer of this controversial software is the Israeli technology company NSO Group. The lawyer submitted his application in mid-August 2021, in the wake of revelations by Swiss radio and television about the use of Israeli spy software by the criminal justice system and the Federal Intelligence Service.
The Federal Office of Police (FedPol) refused to disclose information about a possible contract with companies offering "GovWare" surveillance programs. This is the result of a ruling by the Federal Administrative Court published on Friday.
The FedPol invoked public interests, including Switzerland's internal and external security. The Federal Administrative Court supports this. The publication of the contract would provide information about the provider and the type of spyware. Based on this information, the targeted criminals would be informed about the possibilities of the program.
Strictly limited use
The judges in St. Gallen recognize that there is a considerable public interest in finding out whether the software purchased by Switzerland is actually Pegasus - especially in light of the revelations that it is used by some states to target opposition members, journalists or foreign leaders. But the disclosure could hinder the work of the judiciary.
The court adds that the use of such a surveillance program is strictly regulated by Swiss law. Its use is only permitted if there is suspicion of a criminal offense or a threat to national security. In addition, the cantonal and federal public prosecutor's offices keep annual surveillance statistics for the Post and Telecommunications Surveillance Service.
The decision of the Federal Administrative Court can be appealed to the Federal Supreme Court. (Judgment A-1310/2022 of 9.1.2024)
©Keystone/SDA
English 
German 
French 
Spanish 
Arabic