The Swiss Times - Swiss News in English

Swiss Cantonal Court of Schwyz Must Investigate Cause of Mosquito Infestation

The Swiss Cantonal Court must further investigate the cause and extent of an alleged mosquito infestation on a rooftop terrace. The Federal Court has accused the court of insufficiently assessing evidence in a neighborhood dispute and making an arbitrary decision. Neighbors faced each other in court, with their apartments having a rooftop terrace. On one terrace, a four-square-meter pond has been standing since 2001, which is said to cause regular swarms of mosquitoes. The complainants filed a lawsuit demanding that the pond be removed, but were unsuccessful in their attempts at the District Court of Höfe despite a private expert opinion and an inspection, and in a second instance at the Cantonal Court of Schwyz. The Federal Court partially accepted the appeal of the alleged mosquito victims, as can be seen from the judgment published on Tuesday. However, it did not address the question of whether there is actually an excessive nuisance caused by mosquitoes from the pond. This must now be examined by the cantonal court. The cantonal court accused the complainant neighbor of not sufficiently substantiating the alleged mosquito infestation. They had neither claimed to have been actually stung by the insects nor explained what was meant by "enormous swarms of mosquitoes". The Federal Court has ruled that the cantonal court has exceeded the requirements placed on the complainants in its assessment. The complainants had to demonstrate when and under what conditions the swarms would appear. If the lower court was implying that the complainants had to count each individual mosquito, this cannot be accepted. The allegedly mosquito-damaged complainants also requested a court-ordered expert opinion, a request which was denied by the cantonal court. The Schwyz court argued that an expert opinion could not determine whether the swarms of mosquitoes were actually caused by the pond or if there was another cause. The Federal Court described this argument, which anticipated the result of the expert opinion, as "arbitrary". The cantonal court did not have the necessary expertise to make this assessment. Rather, an expert opinion appears to be an objectively suitable means of proof in this case. (Judgment 5A 86/2023 of 22 August 2023).

©Keystone/SDA

Most Read

Delivery Services in Switzerland Have New Competition

22 February 2024
Delivery service
An Austrian company opens it's first online supermarket outside the country. Targeting the greater Zurich area.

Murder in Frauenfeld: Trial for the Murder of an Egyptian

22 February 2024
Murder in Frauenfeld
Two men face murder charges over the 2007 killing of a 27-year-old Egyptian, whose body was discovered submerged in Barchetsee.

Swiss Semi-Conductor Government Initiative: Will it Work?

23 February 2024
Swiss semiconductor
SwissChips Initiative represents Switzerland's strategic move to bolster its semiconductor industry amidst global competition.

Swiss CEO Vranckx Moves to the Lufthansa Executive Board

23 February 2024
Swiss CEO
Swiss CEO Dieter Vranckx moves to Lufthansa as Chief Commercial Officer, after leading Swiss through challenging times.

Stay in Touch!

Noteworthy

Swiss biotech
Swiss Biotech Firm Idorsia: Stock Soars – but Why?
26 February 2024
Decathlon
Decathlon Opens 5 more Stores in Switzerland
26 February 2024